United Kingdom: Ahmad Thomson, Islamic hypocrisy and sharia law
Lee Jay Walker
Modern Tokyo Times
In the United Kingdom the British elites reside in leafy areas and understand little about the reality of what is happening in this world. Therefore, this ignorance enables people like Ahmad Thomson to spread Islamic kitman and to reach parts of the nerve centre of British power.
In recent years Ahmad Thomson, who was born Martin Thomson, was allowed to give a speech at Cambridge University and in 2011 he participated at an inter faith event at the House of Lords.
Ahmad Thomson is a member of the Murabitun movement which was founded by Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, another convert to Islam and who is clearly anti-Shia and anti-Catholic.
Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi stated the following:
“Jordan, too is split. The mass are modernist but devoid of an ‘Aqida and a Fiqh, while the Rulership openly espouses one-worldist movements and has issued a Declaration accepting the Shi‘a as if it could subsist within Islam. Shi‘ism is not a cancer in the body of Islam, it was a wart which fell off, hence its name.”
“Bahrain we have identified as an anomaly. Since the rulers are too weak, bearing as they do a calamitous history, they can only do one of two things, submit to the kafir capitalist doctrine of counting people as numbers and give the country over to the Shi‘a, or ask Arabia to annex the territory, thus rescuing the arithmetic. I do not, cannot propose the Maliki Islamic solution. Declare the State Islamic, thus preventing non-Muslims holding office and at the same time charge the Shi‘a Jizya assuring them protection alongside the Jews and Christians. Now there is tolerance at its limit! This would have to be preceded by introducing a collected Zakat.”
Therefore, it is clear that Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi supports Islamic dhimmitude on non-Muslims and Shia Muslims who he deems to be outside of Islam. This is clear evidence that Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi and Murabitun view jizya and enforced Islamic Sharia law on non-Muslims and Shia Muslims to be applicable.
However, Ahmad Thomson through the legal company Wynne Chambers and (http://www.wynnechambers.co.uk/) who belongs to Murabitun is trying to change laws in the United Kingdom, which he deems to be acting unfairly against Muslims. Wynne Chambers does advocacy work in the United Kingdom and Ahmad Thomson talks about inequality in the United Kingdom while praising the virtue of noble Islamic law.
What is more alarming is that in the past Ahmad Thomson was known to have had influence within 10 Downing Street but it is difficult to know why. After all, being a convert and belonging to a movement where the founding father, Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, is anti-Shia and anti-Catholic; then what would he know about mainstream Islam and its powerbase which lies within the Muslim communities of the India subcontinent which have settled in the United Kingdom.
Wynne Chambers is a legal company which focuses on Islamic law and English law and the following is stated on its website:
“At present Muslims in the United Kingdom are promised equal rights in theory, but do not always enjoy them in practice. Wynne Chambers has been at the forefront in indicating, in as realistic and as constructive a manner as possible, where legal reform is most required.”
This legal company is clearly involved in Islamic kitman and Ahmad Thomson knows the reality of Islamic Sharia law but despite this he talks about human rights and Islam. However, let us focus on the land of Mecca and Medina and laws in the United Kingdom.
Let us remember that in the past Ahmad Thomson enjoyed his visit to Saudi Arabia and clearly this means that he supports Muslims visiting a nation which is based on hatred, sexism, and despotism.
In Saudi Arabia it must have been clear to Ahmad Thomson that no non-Muslim places of worship are allowed and that women can’t even drive cars. Also, Ahmad Thomson knows full well that all converts from Islam face the death penalty and that male non-Muslims also face the death penalty if they desire to marry a Muslim female in this nation.
The laws of Saudi Arabia are based on Islamic Sharia law and this means that converts from Islam face the death penalty, people can be stoned to death for adultery, old men can marry young children, homosexuals face the death penalty, people can have limbs chopped off for petty crimes and so forth.
Despite the rampant inequality of Islamic Sharia law and barbaric laws which support killing non-Muslims for merely marrying Muslim females; Ahmad Thomson and Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi still peddle their Islamic kitman.
Both individuals know that non-Muslims are unequal in Islamic Sharia law and when they visited Saudi Arabia they witnessed a nation which even imprisons Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, and other non-Muslims, for merely talking openly about their faith.
These two hypocrites openly proselytize in mainly non-Muslim nations in order to spread the Islamic faith and they do this in the full knowledge that non-Muslims face the death penalty if they try to convert Muslims in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, The Maldives, Yemen, and a few other nations.
However, Ahmad Thomson in the United Kingdom is in the vanguard for changing laws in this nation and his voice is being listened to in important circles.
Ahmad Thomson cries human rights in the United Kingdom but what about the human rights of non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia and Islamic Sharia law?
It is obvious that they have two worlds and Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi can’t hide this with his anti-Shia and anti-non-Muslim comments. Therefore, these individuals and their doctrines and open hypocrisy should be challenged but of course the opposite is happening.
Osama bin Laden despite all his hatred was more honest about Islam than the human rights peddling Ahmad Thomson.
The Islamic kitman brigade is more dangerous because their stealth jihad is much more long term and it is based on eating away at the non-Muslim culture and system from within.
Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi made comments about the Catholic faith:
He stated that “All during the time of Papal power the Catholic Church tortured and burned non-Catholics by an institutionalised system, the Inquisition, the envy of modern America. The celibate priesthood so widely took mistresses, nuns and prostitutes that they could boast that sodomy and pederasty were relatively rare. Unlike today when a prim celibacy has joined a repellent pedophilia.”
Again note the irony! Mohammed married a child therefore if Shaykh Adbalqadir as-Sufi is so focused on lumping history and modernity together then why does he deny reality?
The Islamic Hadiths tell us clearly that Mohammed had sex with slave concubines, married more than 9 women at the same time, divorced often, and married a child.
Therefore, from the pedophilia statement of Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi it is clear that he should be stating the same about Mohammed if he wants to use the same criteria. This is his logic and at the same time pedophilia is sanctioned in Islamic Sharia law and in modern day Saudi Arabia it is allowed for men between the ages of 20 years of age to 80 years of age, or older, to marry a child of 8 years of age or 9 years of age.
Yet Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi and Ahmad Thomson and a multitude of others clearly want to ignore the reality of Islam and Islamic Sharia law. Instead, they want to spread Islam and Islamic Sharia law.
Ahmad Thomson should be given a test because does he want to be selective about Islamic Sharia law in the United Kingdom? If so, does this mean that he is against aspects of Mohammed and Islamic Sharia law?
Ahmad Thomson knows that the Hadiths and Islamic Sharia law supports child marriage, killing apostates, killing homosexuals, stoning people to death for adultery, and so forth.
Therefore, does he want these laws to be installed into British law? If not, then how Muslim is this individual?
It is mystifying to how these individuals think and how they can deny reality and be so selective.
However, what is more mystifying is how Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, Ahmad Thomson, and a host of others, can peddle their hypocrisy without being challenged by reality.
Also, why is the British government listening to people like Ahmad Thomson? After all, whatever the weaknesses you have in the British legal system at least unlike Islamic Sharia law it does not support killing apostates, cross amputation, stoning to death and so forth.
Instead of listening to these hypocrites they should be challenged and rebuked for their hypocrisy because Islamic kitman and stealth jihad is a bigger threat than terrorism.
http://www.shaykhabdalqadir.com/content/articles/Art115_30032011.php – The full texts of what Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi stated.
http://moderntokyotimes.com (please visit)