Tag Archives: killing homosexuals

Anders Behring Breivik: media spin and hypocrisy in the name of Islamic Sharia law

Anders Behring Breivik: media spin and hypocrisy in the name of Islamic Sharia law

Lee Jay Walker

Modern Tokyo Times

Homosexuals hanged under Islamic Sharia law in Iran

Many individuals and writers who are rather timid in responding to homosexuals being hanged in Iran, amputations in Saudi Arabia for minor crimes, raped women being stoned to death in Somalia and then linking this with Islamic Sharia law, appears to be not on their agenda. However, the same writers who ignore this then link one individual called Anders Behring Breivik in order to lambast Robert Spencer, Pamella Geller and a host of other writers or organizations who support democracy. However, the same individuals fail to link either Islamic institutional discrimination which kills apostates in the name of Islam or when individuals did September 11 and stated openly that it was their Islamic duty.

Eugene Robinson, Opinion Writer at the Washington Post, is just one of the multitudes of hypocrites.  Did the same Eugene Robinson put emphasis on Muslim religious leaders who said that “Islam is a religion of peace” after September 11?

Also, Osama bin Laden was clearly inspired by the Koran and Hadiths and if Eugene Robinson and the same so-called progressives are going to imply the same logic; then do they support pressure being put on people who read the Koran and support Islamic Sharia law?

Yes, many individual Muslim religious leaders may support peace but institutional discrimination in accordance with the teaching of Islamic Sharia law is a fact in many Islamic nations which are ruled by Islam.

Minority Muslim groups like the Alevi in Turkey and Ahmadiyya in Pakistan face Sunni Islamic persecution and if Sunni Islam took power in Syria then the Alawites have much to fear.  Muslims are not a monolith and many individuals will think differently just like Buddhists, Christians, Hindus and non-religious people.  However, Islamic Sharia law is a monolith and it threatens non-Muslims and moderate Muslims like the Ahmadiyya.

Eugene Robinson and a multitude of so-called progressive writers who are now lambasting democrats who understand the threat of global Islamic jihad desire to apply one rule. This applies to hypocrisy and ignoring the greater terrorist threat which kills frequently in nations like Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, Thailand and other nations. 

If Eugene Robinson and others are trying to silence Robert Spencer, Pamela Geller, and a host of others; then what about the multitude of Islamic terrorist attacks whereby non-Muslims and minority Muslim groups are being killed and sometimes beheaded by the followers of radical Sunni Islam……will Eugene Robinson and other so-called progressives denounce Islamic religious leaders who are inciting violence based on the Koran and Hadiths?

Eugene Robinson and the so-called progressives are so politically correct that it makes you wonder what planet they reside on.  After all, in modern day Saudi Arabia all Sunni Muslim apostates face the threat of death and not one single Buddhist temple, Christian church or Hindu temple is allowed.

Shia Muslims are also treated like second-class citizens in Saudi Arabia and clearly the Shia face massive discrimination in Bahrain, Yemen, and other Sunni Muslim dominated nations.  Even in moderate Malaysia the Shia faith is illegal and Sunni Muslim converts to Shia Islam face persecution.

Other Islamic nations implement the death penalty for apostasy but can Eugene Robinson mention one non-Muslim nation in the modern world which supports killing apostates? 

Of course religious discrimination exists in other nations but we are talking about killing apostates or the death penalty for non-Muslim men for marrying a Muslim female.  Which non-Muslim nation allows this under its legal code?  

In Iran two young homosexuals were hanged and remember apostates and homosexuals are not being killed by deranged individuals who kill innocents, which was the case in Norway whereby Anders Behring Breivik massacred innocent individuals and who will pay for his evil crime against humanity.

On the contrary, Islamic Sharia law is killing these homosexuals and apostates because of state sanctioned discrimination which is based on the Koran and Hadiths.  Also, just imagine, what do you think would happen to a Buddhist/Christian/Hindu male who married a Muslim female in Saudi Arabia?

Yes, for an act of love the Buddhist/Christian/Hindu male would face the death penalty.  Again, note that they would be killed for committing no crime apart from being deemed subhuman under the legal code of Islamic Sharia law. 

This hatred is institutional therefore innocents in some Islamic nations which are based on Islamic law are punished or killed for acts of love or thinking freely.  Also, while Islamic religious leaders in these nations continue to support hatred, bigotry, and rampant discrimination by quoting from the Koran and Hadiths; it is abundantly clear that some Islamists believe that one day they will subvert democratic nations and install this hatred.

Eugene Robinson should also note that while every single Muslim apostate to Christianity faces being killed in Somalia it is not a distant problem. Therefore, maybe Eugene Robinson and other so-called progressives believe that killing African Christians in Somalia or homosexuals in Iran is fine or not a problem because the country is distant?

After all, when two million African Animists/Christians/Muslims were being killed by the Arab regime in Khartoum I don’t recall the trendy brigade in the United Kingdom saying much.  Instead it was all about Israel and even the enslavement of Africans in Sudan did not raise much of a shout and today African Muslims in Darfur still face the threat of Arabization.

However, radical Islamists from Somali backgrounds in America and the United Kingdom have actually gone back to Somalia in order to spread Islamic jihad and install Islamic Sharia law.  Therefore, Christians are being beheaded and a raped girl was stoned to death but these barbaric ways are being supported by elements within the Somali community in America and the United Kingdom – this blows away the assimilation theory of Eugene Robinson and surely he understands what Islamic kitman means?

Irrespective of what people may think about Robert Spencer or Pamela Geller they both support democracy, liberty, and the rule of law whereby all individuals are equal.

Is Eugene Robinson going to claim that Islamic Sharia law supports equality and that the testimony of a non-Muslim is equal in court cases involving a non-Muslim and a Muslim?  Is Eugene Robinson going to link the Koran and Muslim religious leaders who have incited violence against non-Muslims and minority Muslim groups?  Is Eugene Robinson going to stand up and denounce institutional hatred against homosexuals who face the death penalty and state that this hatred is inspired by Islamic law?  Is Eugene Robinson going to stand up against Islamic Sharia based nations which support killing non-Muslim men for merely marrying a Muslim female?

It is abundantly clear that Islamic Sharia law, the Hadiths and the Koran support massive discrimination against non-Muslims.  Therefore, the so-called progressives like Eugene Robinson appear to be sleep-walking or they are being extremely selective.

The simple reality is that Anders Behring Breivik will be locked away for the evil he did.  However, when women are being stoned to death, homosexuals are being killed and apostates face the death penalty; all this is being done in accordance with Islamic Sharia law. 

This is state sanctioned hatred in the name of a religion which does not tolerate equality when in power.  Therefore, why are Eugene Robinson and the rest of the so-called progressives so noisy about one deranged individual with no political power but then say little about the daily reality of nations like Saudi Arabia?

Also, note the “Islamic victim card” once more but clearly nearly everyone killed by Anders Behring Breivik were either Christian or secular. 

Not that it matters who Anders Behring Breivik killed because his actions were pure evil and he should never see the outside world again.  In Norway non-Muslims and Muslims are equal in law unlike the institutional discrimination of nations like Saudi Arabia.

Clearly, the sad fact is that Anders Behring Breivik is being brushed aside by so-called progressives and instead it is an opportunity to attack individuals who are democratic and support liberty.

More important why the clear double-standards and not only this, what about progressives boycotting goods from Saudi Arabia because of state institutional hatred whereby apostates face the death penalty and homosexuals also face the same brutal system. This is all being done under Sharia Islamic law.

Clearly, this will never happen because of energy factors but progressives should not concern themselves with the motives of capitalists.  Also, is Eugene Robinson going to claim that the Koran and Hadiths did not inspire the individuals who did September 11 and that state institutional hatred towards all non-Muslims and homosexuals in Saudi Arabia is not based on the Hadiths, Koran and Sharia Islamic law?


These links either show discrimination or the nature of Islamic Sharia law – Islamists beheading a convert from Islam to Christianity. – Raped woman stoned to death in Somalia – Massacre of Ahmadiyya Muslims – Amputations and flogging in Saudi Arabia,,5417393,00.html – Persecution of the Alevi,,5417393,00.html – Islamic groups who hate the United Kingdom – Iran Minister supports killing homosexuals and based on Islamic Sharia law    PLEASE VISIT


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

United Kingdom: Ahmad Thomson, Islamic hypocrisy and sharia law

United Kingdom: Ahmad Thomson, Islamic hypocrisy and sharia law

Lee Jay Walker

Modern Tokyo Times


In the United Kingdom the British elites reside in leafy areas and understand little about the reality of what is happening in this world.  Therefore, this ignorance enables people like Ahmad Thomson to spread Islamic kitman and to reach parts of the nerve centre of British power.

In recent years Ahmad Thomson, who was born Martin Thomson, was allowed to give a speech at Cambridge University and in 2011 he participated at an inter faith event at the House of Lords.

Ahmad Thomson is a member of the Murabitun movement which was founded by Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, another convert to Islam and who is clearly anti-Shia and anti-Catholic.

Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi stated the following:

“Jordan, too is split. The mass are modernist but devoid of an ‘Aqida and a Fiqh, while the Rulership openly espouses one-worldist movements and has issued a Declaration accepting the Shi‘a as if it could subsist within Islam. Shi‘ism is not a cancer in the body of Islam, it was a wart which fell off, hence its name.” 

“Bahrain we have identified as an anomaly. Since the rulers are too weak, bearing as they do a calamitous history, they can only do one of two things, submit to the kafir capitalist doctrine of counting people as numbers and give the country over to the Shi‘a, or ask Arabia to annex the territory, thus rescuing the arithmetic. I do not, cannot propose the Maliki Islamic solution. Declare the State Islamic, thus preventing non-Muslims holding office and at the same time charge the Shi‘a Jizya assuring them protection alongside the Jews and Christians. Now there is tolerance at its limit! This would have to be preceded by introducing a collected Zakat.”

Therefore, it is clear that Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi supports Islamic dhimmitude on non-Muslims and Shia Muslims who he deems to be outside of Islam.  This is clear evidence that Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi and Murabitun view jizya and enforced Islamic Sharia law on non-Muslims and Shia Muslims to be applicable.

However, Ahmad Thomson through the legal company Wynne Chambers and ( who belongs to Murabitun is trying to change laws in the United Kingdom, which he deems to be acting unfairly against Muslims.  Wynne Chambers does advocacy work in the United Kingdom and Ahmad Thomson talks about inequality in the United Kingdom while praising the virtue of noble Islamic law.

What is more alarming is that in the past Ahmad Thomson was known to have had influence within 10 Downing Street but it is difficult to know why.  After all, being a convert and belonging to a movement where the founding father, Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, is anti-Shia and anti-Catholic; then what would he know about mainstream Islam and its powerbase which lies within the Muslim communities of the India subcontinent which have settled in the United Kingdom.

Wynne Chambers is a legal company which focuses on Islamic law and English law and the following is stated on its website:

“At present Muslims in the United Kingdom are promised equal rights in theory, but do not always enjoy them in practice. Wynne Chambers has been at the forefront in indicating, in as realistic and as constructive a manner as possible, where legal reform is most required.”

This legal company is clearly involved in Islamic kitman and Ahmad Thomson knows the reality of Islamic Sharia law but despite this he talks about human rights and Islam.  However, let us focus on the land of Mecca and Medina and laws in the United Kingdom.

Let us remember that in the past Ahmad Thomson enjoyed his visit to Saudi Arabia and clearly this means that he supports Muslims visiting a nation which is based on hatred, sexism, and despotism.

In Saudi Arabia it must have been clear to Ahmad Thomson that no non-Muslim places of worship are allowed and that women can’t even drive cars.  Also, Ahmad Thomson knows full well that all converts from Islam face the death penalty and that male non-Muslims also face the death penalty if they desire to marry a Muslim female in this nation.

The laws of Saudi Arabia are based on Islamic Sharia law and this means that converts from Islam face the death penalty, people can be stoned to death for adultery, old men can marry young children, homosexuals face the death penalty, people can have limbs chopped off for petty crimes and so forth.

Despite the rampant inequality of Islamic Sharia law and barbaric laws which support killing non-Muslims for merely marrying Muslim females; Ahmad Thomson and Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi still peddle their Islamic kitman.

Both individuals know that non-Muslims are unequal in Islamic Sharia law and when they visited Saudi Arabia they witnessed a nation which even imprisons Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, and other non-Muslims, for merely talking openly about their faith.

These two hypocrites openly proselytize in mainly non-Muslim nations in order to spread the Islamic faith and they do this in the full knowledge that non-Muslims face the death penalty if they try to convert Muslims in Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, The Maldives, Yemen, and a few other nations.

However, Ahmad Thomson in the United Kingdom is in the vanguard for changing laws in this nation and his voice is being listened to in important circles. 

Ahmad Thomson cries human rights in the United Kingdom but what about the human rights of non-Muslims in Saudi Arabia and Islamic Sharia law?

It is obvious that they have two worlds and Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi can’t hide this with his anti-Shia and anti-non-Muslim comments.  Therefore, these individuals and their doctrines and open hypocrisy should be challenged but of course the opposite is happening.

Osama bin Laden despite all his hatred was more honest about Islam than the human rights peddling Ahmad Thomson.

The Islamic kitman brigade is more dangerous because their stealth jihad is much more long term and it is based on eating away at the non-Muslim culture and system from within. 

Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi made comments about the Catholic faith:

He stated that All during the time of Papal power the Catholic Church tortured and burned non-Catholics by an institutionalised system, the Inquisition, the envy of modern America. The celibate priesthood so widely took mistresses, nuns and prostitutes that they could boast that sodomy and pederasty were relatively rare. Unlike today when a prim celibacy has joined a repellent pedophilia.”

Again note the irony!  Mohammed married a child therefore if Shaykh Adbalqadir as-Sufi is so focused on lumping history and modernity together then why does he deny reality?

The Islamic Hadiths tell us clearly that Mohammed had sex with slave concubines, married more than 9 women at the same time, divorced often, and married a child.

Therefore, from the pedophilia statement of Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi it is clear that he should be stating the same about Mohammed if he wants to use the same criteria.  This is his logic and at the same time pedophilia is sanctioned in Islamic Sharia law and in modern day Saudi Arabia it is allowed for men between the ages of 20 years of age to 80 years of age, or older, to marry a child of 8 years of age or 9 years of age.

Yet Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi and Ahmad Thomson and a multitude of others clearly want to ignore the reality of Islam and Islamic Sharia law.  Instead, they want to spread Islam and Islamic Sharia law.

Ahmad Thomson should be given a test because does he want to be selective about Islamic Sharia law in the United Kingdom?  If so, does this mean that he is against aspects of Mohammed and Islamic Sharia law?

Ahmad Thomson knows that the Hadiths and Islamic Sharia law supports child marriage, killing apostates, killing homosexuals, stoning people to death for adultery, and so forth.

Therefore, does he want these laws to be installed into British law?  If not, then how Muslim is this individual?

It is mystifying to how these individuals think and how they can deny reality and be so selective.

However, what is more mystifying is how Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi, Ahmad Thomson, and a host of others, can peddle their hypocrisy without being challenged by reality.

Also, why is the British government listening to people like Ahmad Thomson? After all, whatever the weaknesses you have in the British legal system at least unlike Islamic Sharia law it does not support killing apostates, cross amputation, stoning to death and so forth.

Instead of listening to these hypocrites they should be challenged and rebuked for their hypocrisy because Islamic kitman and stealth jihad is a bigger threat than terrorism.

(  – The full texts of what Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi stated. (please visit)


Posted by on June 10, 2011 in EUROPE, Islam, RELIGIOUS ISSUES


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,